Web5. The Kerala High Court in the case of Chithrangathan v. Seema, (2008) 1 DMC 365 examined the question of maintainability of revision against an ad interim order passed under Section 23(2) of the Act and held that the order impugned was appealable under Section 29 of the Act and revision was not maintainable. WebFeb 4, 2024 · Bench: JUSTICE Brij Kishore Dube. Meenakshi Jatav & Ors. Vs. Seema Sehar (dr.) & Anr. On 28 January 2013. No specific allegations made against petitioners — Petitioners are sisters-in-law of respondent, are residing separately — Marriage of petitioners took place much before marriage of respondent — Relief sought for under …
Girijan vs Subhadra on 25 June, 2008 - Indian Kanoon
WebJul 27, 2016 · In rebuttal Ld. Counsel for appellant, relying upon judgements titled as Chithrangathan Vs. Seema of Kerala High Court, dated 04.09.2007 AND Yogendra Nath Dwivedi Vs. Smt. Vinita Dwivedi of Madhya Pradesh High Court of dated 10.08.2015, has submitted that the present appeal is maintainable under Section 29 of The Protection of … WebChitrangathan Vs. Seema on 14th day of October, 2009. Law Point: ... passed an order on 23.8.2008 restraining first respondent and her husband from causing any sort of … how many inches away from a curb
SC HC Judgment Favoring Men - Sahodar
WebORDER 1. This civil revision petition raises important question touching jurisdiction of Court below and law whether the Court below in the context of the provisions of Article 21 of … WebFeb 15, 2024 · Chithrangathan Vs Seema on 4 September, 2007. Posted on February 15, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife. Kerala High Court has dismissed this revision petition as PWDV Act provides for Appeal under Sec 29. Chithrangathan Vs Seema on 4 September, 2007. WebAug 20, 2009 · The reliance is also placed upon Chithrangathan Vs. Seema I (2008) DMC 365, Kerala wherein it was held that right to appeal under Section 29 of the Act is not … how many inches between 57 and 61